scarylady: (Default)
scarylady ([personal profile] scarylady) wrote in [community profile] writerslounge2011-06-03 03:40 pm

A question on tenses: what is acceptable, and what makes people point accusingly.

Hiya all.

I have a question for you, if you'll indulge me.  I'm planning my next, long, chaptered fanfic, and as I'm making my initial forays into writing it I'm strongly feeling that, to get the style and feel right, I want a third-person, present-tense Prologue, and a third-person past-tense Rest of Fic.

Is this allowable?  Or is it sloppy?  I would prefer not to write the entire thing in present tense, but the Prologue is resisting all my efforts to re-write it into past tense.
niniane: belle face (Default)

[personal profile] niniane 2011-06-03 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure that I'd call it "sloppy" per se, but confusing, definitely.

I'm honestly a big fan of third person, limited POV set in the past tense. I think that other tenses/POVs can work, but if you're going to use them, I sort of want a reason for why you just need the different tense/POV rather than the standard default. (i.e. I've seen second person POV, future tense work, but the author really thought out why he needed to use this tense vs. something a bit more standard)

So if there's a damned good reason for shifting POV/tense, I say go for it. But it's definitely a distraction to do that (and distractions tend to annoy me and other readers), so I'd be wary. Prologues, I think, can be especially daunting as we expect them to come first (chronologically), so it's hard to see why this would be in present, but stuff that came later would have happened in the past.

Again, though, a lot depends on the reason for writing it in present tense. If the idea is that the prologue happened later than the rest of the story, and so the view point character is using it to set the stage for the story as a whole, it might make sense that it's in present, and the rest of the story is the story that he/she is telling.

Then again, I also tend to hate prologues and epilogues unless there's a damned good reason for them, too, so I may not be the best person to ask as to whether or not you should use one as my default answer would be, "Cut out the prologue. Problem solved!"
niniane: belle face (Default)

[personal profile] niniane 2011-06-03 04:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah...and to me, that would make me think that it probably needs a rewrite into the past.

I'm of the impression that there are no real "rules" to writing, as no matter what the rule is, you can find someone who's broken it well. But there are a lot of "generally good ideas", that can really only be broken when you know why you're doing it. (Well, in my opinion, anyway.) And sticking to the same tense/POV in a story is one of those "generally a good idea" things. (Although I've seen a lot veer between omniscient and limited third person POV, as long as it's not done in a single scene.)

What is it that reads/works better about the present tense? Is there a way to regain the immediacy in other ways? (i.e. using active rather than passive verbs, or something along those lines?)
nightsfury: (Default)

[personal profile] nightsfury 2011-06-04 11:31 am (UTC)(link)
Echoing what ninane said about prologue/epilogue and POV, I'll just add the following.
Are you trying for a feeling of immediacy? Tension? Maybe changing the rhythm of the prose, using hard sounding words and short sentences might help. What effect are you trying to set up in the scene? What do you want the reader to come away with after reading it?
Also, I've sometimes found that switching to a different character's POV sometimes helps a scene to gel better.
Hope this helps.
niniane: belle face (Default)

[personal profile] niniane 2011-06-05 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I've definitely done a lot of "keep trying POVs until one works" things. It's pathetic how many scenes have been rewritten like...10 times...as I keep switching POV. But, you know, it's a handy trick! And whatever works!