Date: 2011-10-08 10:55 pm (UTC)
intothewood: (Default)
From: [personal profile] intothewood
Personally I'm very comfortable with "beautiful" as a descriptive term for the ability to capture and convey a reaction to ugly things. To quote a too often quoted saying, beauty is in the eye of the beholder?

I keep coming back to other art forms to make comparisons because I think it's valid that not everyone will respond to a certain form of prose, but does that decrease (or increase) the value of what's being said? Perhaps because language is ubiquitously used as everyday expression we hold it to a different standard? Though symbols - artistic renderings - are as well. We don't want cubist formations of little guys and gals telling us where the toilets are, but we can easily differentiate between interpretation and symbol. Can we as easily and generously differentiate between prose and text?

Huh, I thought I had something there. Maybe it's still there, I dunno. I think there's another glass of wine calling my name.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

writerslounge: (Default)
The Writers' Lounge

About

The Writers' Lounge is a friendly, informal chat, crit, discussion and resources group.

Have questions or want to discuss something? Fire away! Want some feedback on a piece of writing you're working on? Post it! Stuck with research, or found a fabulously useful resource others might benefit from? Step up and share!

We expect a level of maturity in our members, but we're open to all genres and levels of experience. Read full details on the comm profile or, if you need help, contact your friendly mods, [personal profile] intothewood and [personal profile] analect.

_____________________________
layout by [community profile] visualwit

February 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags